No sooner than writing my last post on how I thought there was something weird about some recent events in New Mexico and the way they were being reported, I saw that there had been fresh body-cam footage regarding the investigation of the missing air force general released.
As you could have guessed, there are some weird things about the new information.
Weird things about the reporting, or what was and was not reported.
On February 27th, the day this story broke, the day the general went missing, most outlets covering the story, at core, were reporting the same information and the same basic timeline of the events of that morning. In the following days, or perhaps weeks, the only new information or evidence gathered by the authorities, was a USAF sweatshirt found discarded and entirely clean of DNA, a few miles away from the missing general’s residence.
Now, pretty much three months to the day, new footage from the Bernalillo sheriff’s department has been released, I urge you, if you have found this case interesting, watch the new footage.
If you read my last article on this bizarre situation, I won’t need to tell you why I’m dubious, if you haven’t, you should, because I’m moving on to the fresh confusion that has arisen in the case.
A few new pieces of information are brought to light by the new footage, I’ll go through them chronologically, as presented by the bodycam footage.
Firstly, it is revealed that the night before he went missing, McCasland was at dinner with an unspecified business partner, and members of Spaceforce. During this dinner, he was reportedly distant, quiet.
This feels like it should have been immediately relevant to his sudden disappearance, a business casual dinner date between a private business and a governmental agency? Seems tense.
The second thing I found strange about this new revelation, is the source of this information.
An unspecified woman, a business partner, spoke to detectives on the phone, the day after McCasland went missing. On the phone, this woman claims that she is literally walking into his favourite coffee shop right at that very moment, to look for him. Then, she goes over what he was wearing when she had saw him at dinner the previous Thursday. The unknown woman on the phone, when asked by the detective, states very clearly that McCasland has an active security clearance, of an incredibly high nature, even going on to say that his name is attached to UFO disclosure documents that are currently pending release.
This phone call happened on February 28th.
That means this unknown woman was talking about the things we are seeing released right now.
This unspecified woman goes on to say that she has been calling around bases to see if McCasland has used his ID anywhere. You can hear very clearly over the phone, that this woman is most certainly not in a coffee shop. What he was wearing on Thursday evening was irrelevant, but offering information seemed helpful. How can she just call bases and ask those questions, who is this lady? Authorities had this information, and this mystery Fed that they really should have questioned more, if they didn’t, on the second day of the investigation, but we are only hearing about it now.
McCasland is reported to have been discovered missing at around noon. In the newly released footage, we see that investigators didn’t arrive at his residence until around 17:00.
In the footage from this interview with the general’s wife, there are a few things I find quite troubling. Numerous times over the course of the interview, there are strange audio glitches and noises I strongly believe to be signs of AI manipulation.
There are certain times when the general’s wife’s voice sounds as though it has been masked, I would understand the need for privacy and discretion, but there are also moments in which I think AI has been used to alter or obscure the things she was saying.
There is a moment in which she makes a statement about McCasland having to resign from a position on a board in D.C because of – something that doesn’t sound like a real word. An ineligible word or sound. The detective understands her perfectly, at the time.
During this same segment of the bodycam, there are dogs barking loudly and incessantly in the background, however, at one point, there is a loud, jarring and warped sound that sounds like someone shouting half a name or some garbled word. This is because AI has mistakenly filtered a dog barking into some kind of simile of a logical thing.
I can’t prove it, but someone else probably can.
Why would they go to the effort of editing the bodycams? Who knows.
It won’t be us, I can tell you that, not until its far too late or expensive to prosecute anyone about it. While at the general’s residence, having a conversation that was later edited with AI, with his wife, the detectives ask if the general has any weapons. The general’s wife confirms he does and, for the first time, states that she does not know if anything was taken.
McCasland’s wife will, over the remainder of the bodycam, states numerous times that she is not familiar enough with their firearms or their storage to know if anything has been taken.
She states this with sheer conviction, many times. Of all her statements in the bodycam, her saying she doesn’t know that, makes up a great deal of them.
While she most definitely, without a doubt didn’t know if McCasland had taken a gun, his wife did know, and stated to great detail, that the general probably had a satellite phone with him, as she couldn’t find it. To this day, reports still state that McCasland is known to be carrying a .38 revolver in a leather holster as if it is indisputable. Where did they get this information? They have known about the general possibly having a satellite phone since day one, why did they only disclose this mystery revolver?
During this portion of the footage, detectives also learn that the general was preparing for a skiing expedition, to a lodge of some kind, with 17 friends, the following week.
The general’s wife explains that he has been preparing for it but recently had started feeling unsure about his ability to make it, stating he had felt in declining health.
Long-time friends and peers of a man like McCasland’s are, lets face it, likely people in similar fields, ex and current colleagues, scientists and top-level researchers, people with clearances, or who had clearances. Smart group of buddies, out in the mountains, who knows what stories could be passed around a campfire like that.
I do not think all these things are coincidental.
Especially since McCasland is one of three people left in the world with knowledge of the fabrication of a super-advanced aerospace metal used for spaceships. Of the other two, one is his colleague who went missing in the same state last year, and the other, another colleague, is dead.
From here, drones are launched and a search dog handler is brought to the residence.
The search dog handler seems more interested in talking shop with his colleagues.
I honestly don’t know how else to put it. On his arrival, he seems unsure about whether or not his dog could track this man, from his home… I may be unclear on a few things about how professional dogs operate, but I would think that one could probably follow your scent, from the place that you live, if you just maybe put a little hustle into it? The officer knew, without a shadow of a doubt, that McCasland had left his home and that was his last known position.
He goes on to say he thinks the dog may only be able to track him a mile or so.
Maybe that’s how search dogs work, but here was me thinking they had more range than a mile.
The detectives go and stand around in the general’s yard for a while, for some reason, and don’t really check anything other than a very small shed.
At one point, one of the officers points out what are clearly fresh bicycle tracks in the dirt next to the garage, they are instantly dismissed because they were ‘sure’ no bikes were missing.
The wife seemed ‘sure’ she couldn’t tell if any guns were missing, so I don’t buy it.
The responding officers do not seem to grasp the weight of what the case might turn into, which is fair, but what if they just weren’t trying to find him?
The next day was when I started having serious doubts about how this case has been presented, or what is really going on.
The day after the general went missing is the day detectives spoke with the illusive woman.
It is also the day that different investigators spoke to McCasland’s neighbours.
In the released footage, we see an interview with a neighbour of McCasland, and in this interview, she tells the investigator that there is a tunnel know one knows about, that leads right up to the mountains.
She goes on to say they should probably check.
Whether they ever did, I guess we’ll never know.
Another interview, with another neighbour, really put the icing on the ‘this is getting incredibly strange’ cake for me. This man claims to not really know McCasland well, but then almost immediately backtracks and states he actually used to work for him, then backtracks again and makes it clear he worked with him in a very removed, separated fashion.
The man is visibly uncomfortable from the moment he leaves his door, which he draws closed behind him. He clearly wants the officer to leave, but doesn’t want to seem suspicious, so keeps opening his mouth and letting things fall out. While he doesn’t know the general well, if at all, the man did seem to know the general’s wife by her first name. He even tells the officer that the general lives two houses over, then proceeds to tell the officer, which cameras on which houses in the street can see the general’s residence. I don’t know need to say it, but I will.
Why does he know that?
Another strange thing about this neighbour, is that just to side of frame in the footage, you can see that he has some kind of patch or insignia stuck in the windowpane next to his front door.
The quality is not ideal, but I have tried to find a matching emblem or patch, reverse searches and what not, and found nothing. I think it looks like an eagle, a shield, a bell, and an eye.
All of which are symbology I find unsettling, but I hope I am wrong and it is just some harmless, security cam branding or something of that nature.
The picture will be on my Instagram, if you want to have a crack at it.
The final segment of the newly released footage shows us a snippet of conversation in which everyone’s face and the location have been redacted, it is allegedly a group of hikers telling an officer that they think they talked to the general on the trail, earlier that day.
During the conversation, for some odd reason, all of the hikers keep repeating the word ‘oriented’ like it means something, or they had been paid to.
A day after the story broke, McCasland’s wife made a Facebook post, stating that her husband didn’t hold active security credentials, that he doesn’t know anything about UFOs and he never has, but that isn’t what the mystery women was claiming, and she had made that claim that same day. This footage wasn’t released to the public until yesterday.
If Mrs McCasland was refuting what this woman had said, how? the public hadn’t heard this woman’s statement. Was it even the general’s wife that made the post?
I think they all know exactly what is going on, but like the recent chemical exposure, they will not be giving us the full truth.
Whatever happened to that repairman, that was the last one to see McCasland alive?
Life, and Other Stuff 
Leave a comment